Data analytics in higher education have gained the attention of Huffington Post and are discussed in a recent article detailing the advancements in how data can be used in universities. The data can be useful in predicting whether students are in trouble academically so their problems can be dealt with more immediately. The article quotes, “Predictive analytics hold the promise that faculty and administrators can intervene at an earlier juncture and help positively impact learning outcomes that ultimately lead to higher graduation rates.”
The article states that the difficulity in managing data is retrieving it from different sources and compiling it to make it into a usable format. The data comes from sources such as individual professors who make the grades, and from a university database that holds information on students such as classes they are enrolled in and whether they have failed a class or not. The most important aspect of predictive analysis, in my opinion, should be managed at the individual professor level. The university is unlikely to have the ability to predict whether a student will fail a class based on a general schema for all classes. Some classes are based on only two exams and a small percentage for homework. If a student failed the first homework, for example, the prediction for this student be that he or she will fail the class. The failure of the homework may or may not reflect on how well the student will do on the exam, which makes up a significant portion of the grade. The predictive analysis will have little accuracy in this case, unless it is done at the individual professor level. The professor would be able to tell much better for the way his or her class was taught if a student was likely to fail. Predictive analytics may not be the best answer in identifying and helping struggling students.
While I disagreed with some aspects of the article, I found that it did contain some interesting links. One link was to Purdue University’s Course Signals. This resource for students “detects early warning signs and provides intervention to students who may not be performing to the best of their abilities before they reach a critical point”. It relies on individual instructors to judge the criteria for an at-risk student, alert them, and provide them with resources for improving their grade in the class.
This article focuses on the ability for data analysis to increase graduation rates and quickly predict whether a student is struggling. I do not think that available data would necessarily provide for an accurate estimation on if a student will fail a class, since many variables influence the success of a student. A student may struggle at the beginning of a class because he or she did poorly on a single assignment, or may not have the same educational grounding as other students. These factors do not predict accurately if a student will fail a class because the learning process occurs over an entire semester. Success cannot be judged within a small enough time period that a data analysis tool would be useful in predicting failure or success as accurately as students and instructors who are directly involved with the class. The predictive analysis must be done at an individual class or even student level, and therefore does not rely on data nearly as much as the article states.
Link to article:<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-devine/big-data-big-potential_b_2066184.html?utm_hp_ref=college>
cyberprofgus on Online Education cyberprofgus on Public Underwater Video Feed L… cyberprofgus on Thought on Meredith Kahn’s… cyberprofgus on What Women Want cyberprofgus on Data to Information Infog…